How to Write a Grant Application

How to Write a Grant Application

by Allan Hackshaw
How to Write a Grant Application

How to Write a Grant Application

by Allan Hackshaw

Paperback

$41.95 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
    Choose Expedited Shipping at checkout for delivery by Thursday, April 4
  • PICK UP IN STORE
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


Overview

This concise guide covers the important angles of your grant application, whether for a health research project or personal training programme, and will help you be among the successful applicants.

The author, a reviewer for grant funding organisations and internationally respected research scientist, gives you the benefit of his experience from both sides of the process in this easy-to-use, readable guide. The book takes you through the grant application process, explaining how to:

  • Present the justification for the proposed project
  • Describe the study design clearly
  • Estimate the financial costs
  • Understand a typical review process, and how this can influence the contents of the grant application

The author provides practical advice on a range of project types (observational studies, clinical trials, laboratory experiments, and systematic reviews) to increase the chance that your application will be successful. There are also tips on what to avoid throughout the application.

With generic information about application requirements, How to Write a Grant Application is ideal for healthcare professionals seeking a health services or scientific grant.


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781405197557
Publisher: Wiley
Publication date: 01/04/2011
Series: How To
Pages: 144
Product dimensions: 5.40(w) x 8.40(h) x 0.50(d)

About the Author

Allan Hackshaw, Deputy Director of the Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, and Reader in Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, London, UK

Read an Excerpt

Click to read or download

Table of Contents

Foreword.

Preface.

Acknowledgements.

About the author.

Chapter 1: Overview.

1.1 Types of grants.

1.2 Types of funding organisations.

1.3 Choosing an appropriate funding body.

1.4 Contents of the grant application.

1.5 Including several studies in one application (project grants).

1.6 Translational research sub-studies.

1.7 The application process.

1.8 Estimating timelines and a planned work schedule.

1.9 Intellectual property.

1.10 Text, grammar and format.

Chapter 2: People involved in the study.

2.1 Who should be part of the Study Team?

2.2 Other investigators, collaborators and consultants.

2.3 The host institution and Sponsor.

2.4 Commercial companies.

2.5 Oversight committees.

Chapter 3: Justifi cation for the study.

3.1 Finding background information.

3.2 Previous evidence and similar research (why the study is needed now).

3.3 Biological plausibility.

3.4 Safety of new interventions in clinical trials.

3.5 Feasibility.

3.6 What will the study contribute?

3.7 Summary of the justifi cation for a proposed study.

Chapter 4: Describing the study design.

4.1 Abstract.

4.2 Appendices.

4.3 Study objectives and outcome measures.

4.4 Types of studies.

4.5 Observational studies in humans.

4.6 Clinical trials in humans.

4.7 Laboratory experiments.

4.8 Describing sample size.

4.9 Describing the main statistical analyses.

4.10 Systematic reviews.

Chapter 5: Associated documents with the grant application.

5.1 Study protocol.

5.2 Participant Information Sheet.

5.3 Curricula vitae of the Chief Investigator and all co-applicants.

5.4 Letters of support from co-applicants, centre investigators, collaborators, or other advisors.

5.5 Letters of support from commercial companies.

5.6 Other documents specifi c to the field of research.

Chapter 6: Financial costs.

6.1 Overview of items to include in the fi nancial costs.

6.2 Indirect costs or overheads (full economic costs).

6.3 Per patient (or per subject) payments.

6.4 Staff costs.

6.5 Access to core funds and resources.

6.6 Consideration of costs not to be met by the funding body.

6.7 Grant applications associated with calls for proposals.

6.8 Observational studies in humans.

6.9 Clinical trials in humans.

6.10 Laboratory experiments.

6.11 Systematic reviews.

Chapter 7: Funding body review process.

7.1 Submitting the application.

7.2 Processing the application within the funding body.

7.3 Initial reviews (external reviewers).

7.4 Funding committee meeting.

7.5 Funding committee evaluation.

7.6 Feedback to applicants after the meeting.

7.7 Responding to the funding committee feedback.

Chapter 8: Annual reports and applying for a grant extension.

8.1 Annual reports.

8.2 Applying for a grant extension.

Bibliography.

Index.

What People are Saying About This

From the Publisher

Important Details: According to a world-wide survey carried out by Elsevier, researchers now spend up to 30% of their time looking for funding and writing grant proposals, less than 15% of applications are successful, and the average age of first time National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant recipients is 40.
Funders are attaching more and more conditions to their support programs. Some, such as the National Science Foundation, channel a significant proportion of their resources only to young applicants. Others limit the number of submissions, so that competing research institutions mandate pre-screening of applications so that they can coordinate a separate screening process.
Furthermore, to get best value for their money, funders will often require that the principal investigator has assembled a research team which represents the pinnacle of multidisciplinary and international excellence. As science performance, planning and funding management become more directed by evidence-based assessment methods, so a market for scientific performance analytics emerges.

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews